Comparison · 6×2 lorry · long haul at 19.3 t

DAF CF 530 FTG, lorry (2019) vs Scania R 520 A6x2, lorry (2019–2020)

DAF CF 530 FTG, lorry (2019)

2019 · 390 kW
33.1l/100 km
median; 32.5–38.6 across 16 declared configurations

Scania R 520 A6x2, lorry (2019–2020)

2019–2020 · 382 kW
33.1l/100 km
median; 32.3–35.3 across 10 declared configurations
DAF CF 530 FTG, lorry (2019) and Scania R 520 A6x2, lorry (2019–2020) side by side
SpecificationDAF CF 530 FTG, lorry (2019)Scania R 520 A6x2, lorry (2019–2020)
Vehicle formLorry (BA)RegisteredLorry (BA)Registered
Axle configuration6×2Declared6×2Declared
Registered new2019Registeredcentral 90% of records2019–2020Registeredcentral 90% of records
Engine power390 kWDeclared382 kWDeclared
Engine displacement12.9 litresDeclared16.4 litresDeclared
Gearboxautomated, manualDeclaredautomated, manualDeclared
Gross vehicle weight27,000–28,000 kgDeclaredmedian 27,000 kg, across 16 declared configurations27,000–28,000 kgDeclaredmedian 27,000 kg, across 10 declared configurations
Declared fuel, long haul33.1 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 32.5–38.6 l/100 km across 16 declared configurations33.1 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 32.3–35.3 l/100 km across 10 declared configurations
CO₂ per tonne-km44.9 g Declaredmedian; 44.1–52.3 g44.9 g Declaredmedian; 43.8–47.9 g

Fuel and CO₂: long haul at 19.3 t, 2019 declarations.

What the numbers actually say

There is 0 l/100 km between these two (0%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice. The declared figures for one of them alone span 6.1 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.

Fuel over a year

120,000 km · assumed price
DAF CF 530 FTG, lorry (2019)39,720 litres
£55,608 at the assumed price
Scania R 520 A6x2, lorry (2019–2020)39,720 litres
£55,608 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.