Comparison · 6×2 truck · long haul at 19.3 t

DAF XF 450 FTG, truck (2019) vs Scania R 450 A6x2/4, truck (2019)

Generated illustration, not a photograph: DAF XF 450 FTG, truck (2019), a 6×2 rigid truck

DAF XF 450 FTG, truck (2019)

2019 · 330 kW
32.5l/100 km
median; 32–33.3 across 27 declared configurations

Scania R 450 A6x2/4, truck (2019)

2019 · 331 kW
31.1l/100 km
median; 29.4–34.5 across 33 declared configurations
DAF XF 450 FTG, truck (2019) and Scania R 450 A6x2/4, truck (2019) side by side
SpecificationDAF XF 450 FTG, truck (2019)Scania R 450 A6x2/4, truck (2019)
Vehicle formTruck (BA)RegisteredTruck (BA)Registered
Axle configuration6×2Declared6×2Declared
Registered new2019Registeredcentral 90% of records2019Registeredcentral 90% of records
Engine power330 kWDeclared331 kWDeclared
Engine displacement10.8 litresDeclared12.7 litresDeclared
GearboxautomatedDeclaredautomatedDeclared
Gross vehicle weight27,000 kgDeclared24,300 kgDeclared
Declared fuel, long haul32.5 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 32–33.3 l/100 km across 27 declared configurations31.1 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 29.4–34.5 l/100 km across 33 declared configurations
CO₂ per tonne-km44 g Declaredmedian; 43.4–45.2 g42.2 g Declaredmedian; 39.9–46.8 g

Fuel and CO₂: long haul at 19.3 t, 2019 declarations.

What the numbers actually say

There is 1.4 l/100 km between these two (4.5%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 1,680 litres a year (£2,352). The declared figures for one of them alone span 5.1 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.

Fuel over a year

120,000 km · assumed price
DAF XF 450 FTG, truck (2019)39,000 litres
£54,600 at the assumed price
Scania R 450 A6x2/4, truck (2019)37,320 litres
£52,248 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.