Comparison · 6×2 lorry · long haul at 19.3 t
MAN TGS 28.360 6x2-4, 10.5 L (2019–2020) vs Volvo FM, 250 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry
MAN TGS 28.360 6x2-4, 10.5 L (2019–2020)
2019–2020 · 265 kW
37.7l/100 km
median; 34.6–40.8 across 41 declared configurations
Volvo FM, 250 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry
2014–2019 · 250 kW
37.9l/100 km
median; 35.2–40.5 across 54 declared configurations
What the numbers actually say
There is 0.2 l/100 km between these two (0.5%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 240 litres a year (£336). The declared figures for one of them alone span 6.2 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.
Fuel over a year
120,000 km · assumed priceMAN TGS 28.360 6x2-4, 10.5 L (2019–2020)45,240 litres
£63,336 at the assumed price
Volvo FM, 250 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry45,480 litres
£63,672 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.