Comparison · 8×4 lorry · construction at 12.9 t

MAN TGS 32.360 8x4 vs Scania P 360 B8x4*4

MAN TGS 32.360 8x4

2020–2022 · 265 kW
41.9l/100 km
median; 41.9–42.5 across 4 declared configurations

Scania P 360 B8x4*4

2020–2022 · 265 kW
41.3l/100 km
median; 41.3–41.4 across 2 declared configurations
MAN TGS 32.360 8x4 and Scania P 360 B8x4*4 side by side
SpecificationMAN TGS 32.360 8x4Scania P 360 B8x4*4
Vehicle formLorry (BA)RegisteredLorry (BA)Registered
Axle configuration8×4Declared8×4Declared
Registered new2020–2022Registeredcentral 90% of records2020–2022Registeredcentral 90% of records
Engine power265 kWDeclared265 kWDeclared
Engine displacement9 litresDeclared9.3 litresDeclared
Gearboxautomated, manualDeclaredautomatedDeclared
Gross vehicle weight32,000–34,000 kgDeclaredmedian 34,000 kg, across 28 declared configurations37,000 kgDeclared
Declared fuel, construction41.9 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 41.9–42.5 l/100 km across 4 declared configurations41.3 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 41.3–41.4 l/100 km across 2 declared configurations
CO₂ per tonne-km84.9 g Declaredmedian; 84.9–86.2 g83.7 g Declaredmedian; 83.7–83.9 g

Fuel and CO₂: construction at 12.9 t, 2021 declarations.

What the numbers actually say

There is 0.6 l/100 km between these two (1.4%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 720 litres a year (£1,008).

Fuel over a year

120,000 km · assumed price
MAN TGS 32.360 8x450,280 litres
£70,392 at the assumed price
Scania P 360 B8x4*449,560 litres
£69,384 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.