Comparison · 6×4 lorry · long haul at 19.3 t

MAN TGS 33.360 6x4 vs Volvo FM, 251 kW, 6x4 rigid lorry

MAN TGS 33.360 6x4

2021–2023 · 265 kW
36.4l/100 km
median; 36.4–39.4 across 2 declared configurations

Volvo FM, 251 kW, 6x4 rigid lorry

2021–2022 · 251 kW
39.4l/100 km
median; 37.6–42.2 across 4 declared configurations
MAN TGS 33.360 6x4 and Volvo FM, 251 kW, 6x4 rigid lorry side by side
SpecificationMAN TGS 33.360 6x4Volvo FM, 251 kW, 6x4 rigid lorry
Vehicle formLorry (BA)RegisteredLorry (BA)Registered
Axle configuration6×4Declared6×4Declared
Registered new2021–2023Registeredcentral 90% of records2021–2022Registeredcentral 90% of records
Engine power265 kWDeclared251 kWDeclared
Engine displacement9 litresDeclared10.8 litresDeclared
Gearboxautomated, manualDeclaredautomatedDeclared
Gross vehicle weight26,000–33,000 kgDeclaredmedian 26,000 kg, across 10 declared configurations29,000–35,000 kgDeclaredmedian 30,000 kg, across 12 declared configurations
Declared fuel, long haul36.4 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 36.4–39.4 l/100 km across 2 declared configurations39.4 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 37.6–42.2 l/100 km across 4 declared configurations
CO₂ per tonne-km49.39 g Declaredmedian; 49.39–53.4 g53.4 g Declaredmedian; 51–57.2 g

Fuel and CO₂: long haul at 19.3 t, 2022 declarations.

What the numbers actually say

There is 3 l/100 km between these two (8.2%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 3,600 litres a year (£5,040). The declared figures for one of them alone span 4.6 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.

Fuel over a year

120,000 km · assumed price
MAN TGS 33.360 6x443,680 litres
£61,152 at the assumed price
Volvo FM, 251 kW, 6x4 rigid lorry47,280 litres
£66,192 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.