Comparison · 4×2 lorry · long haul at 14 t
Mercedes-Benz Arocs, 315 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry vs Volvo FM, 315 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry
Mercedes-Benz Arocs, 315 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry
2020–2023 · 315 kW
34.5l/100 km
median; 32.3–42 across 13 declared configurations
Volvo FM, 315 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry
2019–2023 · 315 kW
31.7l/100 km
median; 27.7–44.1 across 47 declared configurations
What the numbers actually say
There is 2.8 l/100 km between these two (8.8%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 3,360 litres a year (£4,704). The declared figures for one of them alone span 16.4 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.
Fuel over a year
120,000 km · assumed priceMercedes-Benz Arocs, 315 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry41,400 litres
£57,960 at the assumed price
Volvo FM, 315 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry38,040 litres
£53,256 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.