Comparison · 8×4 truck · construction at 12.9 t
Mercedes-Benz Arocs, 315 kW, 8x4 rigid truck vs Volvo FH, 315 kW, 8x4 rigid truck
Mercedes-Benz Arocs, 315 kW, 8x4 rigid truck
2018–2024 · 315 kW
45l/100 km
median; 43.3–46.5 across 35 declared configurations
Volvo FH, 315 kW, 8x4 rigid truck
2015–2024 · 315 kW
41.9l/100 km
median; 38.4–44.3 across 12 declared configurations
What the numbers actually say
There is 3.1 l/100 km between these two (7.3%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 3,720 litres a year (£5,208). The declared figures for one of them alone span 5.9 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.
Fuel over a year
120,000 km · assumed priceMercedes-Benz Arocs, 315 kW, 8x4 rigid truck54,000 litres
£75,600 at the assumed price
Volvo FH, 315 kW, 8x4 rigid truck50,280 litres
£70,392 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.