Comparison · 8×4 lorry · construction at 12.9 t
Mercedes-Benz Arocs, 330 kW, 8x4 rigid lorry vs Volvo FMX, 323 kW, 8x4 rigid lorry
Mercedes-Benz Arocs, 330 kW, 8x4 rigid lorry
2014–2024 · 330 kW
44.1l/100 km
median; 42.3–46.7 across 18 declared configurations
Volvo FMX, 323 kW, 8x4 rigid lorry
2021–2023 · 323 kW
43.5l/100 km
median; 39.3–47.2 across 18 declared configurations
What the numbers actually say
There is 0.6 l/100 km between these two (1.3%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 720 litres a year (£1,008). The declared figures for one of them alone span 7.9 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.
Fuel over a year
120,000 km · assumed priceMercedes-Benz Arocs, 330 kW, 8x4 rigid lorry52,920 litres
£74,088 at the assumed price
Volvo FMX, 323 kW, 8x4 rigid lorry52,200 litres
£73,080 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.