Comparison · 6×4 lorry · long haul at 19.3 t
Mercedes-Benz Arocs, 350 kW, 6x4 rigid lorry vs Volvo FH, 345 kW, 6x4 rigid lorry
Mercedes-Benz Arocs, 350 kW, 6x4 rigid lorry
2021–2023 · 350 kW
41.8l/100 km
median; 37.3–47 across 20 declared configurations
Volvo FH, 345 kW, 6x4 rigid lorry
2020–2023 · 345 kW
38.3l/100 km
median; 33–43.3 across 36 declared configurations
What the numbers actually say
There is 3.5 l/100 km between these two (9.1%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 4,200 litres a year (£5,880). The declared figures for one of them alone span 10.3 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.
Fuel over a year
120,000 km · assumed priceMercedes-Benz Arocs, 350 kW, 6x4 rigid lorry50,160 litres
£70,224 at the assumed price
Volvo FH, 345 kW, 6x4 rigid lorry45,960 litres
£64,344 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.