AllTruckData
Comparison · 6×2 lorry · long haul at 19.3 t

Scania G 280 B6x2*4 vs Scania P 280 B6x2/4

Scania G 280 B6x2*4

2020–2023 · 206 kW
31.3l/100 km
median; 31.3–36.5 across 2 declared configurations

Scania P 280 B6x2/4

2019–2023 · 206 kW
34.1l/100 km
median; 34.1–34.5 across 3 declared configurations
Scania G 280 B6x2*4 and Scania P 280 B6x2/4 side by side
SpecificationScania G 280 B6x2*4Scania P 280 B6x2/4
Vehicle formLorry (BA)RegisteredLorry (BA)Registered
Axle configuration6×2Declared6×2Declared
Registered new2020–2023Registeredcentral 90% of records2019–2023Registeredcentral 90% of records
Engine power206 kWDeclared206 kWDeclared
Engine displacement9.3 litresDeclared9.3 litresDeclared
GearboxautomatedDeclaredautomated, automaticDeclared
Gross vehicle weight27,000–28,000 kgDeclaredmedian 28,000 kg, across 5 declared configurations27,000–28,000 kgDeclaredmedian 28,000 kg, across 33 declared configurations
Declared fuel, long haul31.3 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 31.3–36.5 l/100 km across 2 declared configurations34.1 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 34.1–34.5 l/100 km across 3 declared configurations
CO₂ per tonne-km42.49 g Declaredmedian; 42.49–49.5 g46.21 g Declaredmedian; 46.21–46.84 g

Fuel and CO₂: long haul at 19.3 t, 2022 declarations.

What the numbers actually say

There is 2.8 l/100 km between these two (8.9%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 3,360 litres a year (£4,704). The declared figures for one of them alone span 5.2 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.

G 280 B6x2*4 full specificationP 280 B6x2/4 full specification

Fuel over a year

120,000 km · assumed price
Scania G 280 B6x2*437,560 litres
£52,584 at the assumed price
Scania P 280 B6x2/440,920 litres
£57,288 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.