AllTruckData
Comparison · 6×2 lorry · long haul at 19.3 t

Scania G 320 B6x2*4 vs Scania G 320 B6x2

Scania G 320 B6x2*4

2019–2023 · 235 kW
33l/100 km
median; 32.2–35.5 across 6 declared configurations

Scania G 320 B6x2

2019–2020 · 235 kW
34.5l/100 km
median; 33.8–35.2 across 17 declared configurations
Scania G 320 B6x2*4 and Scania G 320 B6x2 side by side
SpecificationScania G 320 B6x2*4Scania G 320 B6x2
Vehicle formLorry (BA)RegisteredLorry (BA)Registered
Axle configuration6×2Declared6×2Declared
Registered new2019–2023Registeredcentral 90% of records2019–2020Registeredcentral 90% of records
Engine power235 kWDeclared235 kWDeclared
Engine displacement9.3 litresDeclared9.3 litresDeclared
Gearboxautomated, automatic, manualDeclaredautomated, manualDeclared
Gross vehicle weight26,100–31,000 kgDeclaredmedian 28,000 kg, across 90 declared configurations26,500–28,000 kgDeclaredmedian 28,000 kg, across 36 declared configurations
Declared fuel, long haul33 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 32.2–35.5 l/100 km across 6 declared configurations34.5 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 33.8–35.2 l/100 km across 17 declared configurations
CO₂ per tonne-km44.72 g Declaredmedian; 43.69–48.12 g46.8 g Declaredmedian; 45.8–47.7 g

Fuel and CO₂: long haul at 19.3 t, 2022 declarations.

What the numbers actually say

There is 1.5 l/100 km between these two (4.5%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 1,800 litres a year (£2,520). The declared figures for one of them alone span 3.3 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.

G 320 B6x2*4 full specificationG 320 B6x2 full specification

Fuel over a year

120,000 km · assumed price
Scania G 320 B6x2*439,600 litres
£55,440 at the assumed price
Scania G 320 B6x241,400 litres
£57,960 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.