Comparison · 6×2 lorry · long haul at 19.3 t

Scania G 320 B6x2*4 vs Volvo FE, 235 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry

Scania G 320 B6x2*4

2019–2023 · 235 kW
33l/100 km
median; 32.2–35.5 across 6 declared configurations

Volvo FE, 235 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry

2022–2023 · 235 kW
l/100 km
Scania G 320 B6x2*4 and Volvo FE, 235 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry side by side
SpecificationScania G 320 B6x2*4Volvo FE, 235 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry
Vehicle formLorry (BA)RegisteredLorry (BA)Registered
Axle configuration6×2Declared6×2Declared
Registered new2019–2023Registeredcentral 90% of records2022–2023Registeredcentral 90% of records
Engine power235 kWDeclared235 kWDeclared
Engine displacement9.3 litresDeclared8.9 litresDeclared
Gearboxautomated, automatic, manualDeclaredautomaticDeclared
Gross vehicle weight26,100–31,000 kgDeclaredmedian 28,000 kg, across 90 declared configurations26,000–28,000 kgDeclaredmedian 27,000 kg, across 32 declared configurations
Declared fuel, long haul33 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 32.2–35.5 l/100 km across 6 declared configurationsNot declared
CO₂ per tonne-km44.72 g Declaredmedian; 43.69–48.12 gNot declared

Fuel and CO₂: long haul at 19.3 t, 2022 declarations.

What the numbers actually say

We publish the table but give no verdict: they have no fuel figure declared on the same mission, payload and reporting period.