AllTruckData
Comparison · 6×2 tractor unit · long haul at 19.3 t

Scania G 410 A6x2 vs Scania P 410 A6x2

Scania G 410 A6x2

2019–2023 · 302 kW
33.1l/100 km
median; across 1 declared configurations

Scania P 410 A6x2

2019–2021 · 302 kW
31.1l/100 km
median; 31.1–33.5 across 2 declared configurations
Scania G 410 A6x2 and Scania P 410 A6x2 side by side
SpecificationScania G 410 A6x2Scania P 410 A6x2
Vehicle formTractor unit for semi-trailer (BC)RegisteredTractor unit for semi-trailer (BC)Registered
Axle configuration6×2Declared6×2Declared
Registered new2019–2023Registeredcentral 90% of records2019–2021Registeredcentral 90% of records
Engine power302 kWDeclared302 kWDeclared
Engine displacement12.7 litresDeclared12.7 litresDeclared
GearboxautomatedDeclaredautomatedDeclared
Gross vehicle weight26,100–30,000 kgDeclaredmedian 27,000 kg, across 33 declared configurations26,500–29,000 kgDeclaredmedian 27,500 kg, across 15 declared configurations
Declared fuel, long haul33.1 l/100 km Declaredmedian; across 1 declared configuration31.1 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 31.1–33.5 l/100 km across 2 declared configurations
CO₂ per tonne-km44.89 g Declaredmedian42.2 g Declaredmedian; 42.2–45.4 g

Fuel and CO₂: long haul at 19.3 t, 2022 declarations.

What the numbers actually say

There is 2 l/100 km between these two (6.4%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 2,400 litres a year (£3,360). The declared figures for one of them alone span 2.4 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.

G 410 A6x2 full specificationP 410 A6x2 full specification

Fuel over a year

120,000 km · assumed price
Scania G 410 A6x239,720 litres
£55,608 at the assumed price
Scania P 410 A6x237,320 litres
£52,248 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.