Comparison · 6×2 lorry · long haul at 19.3 t

Scania G 410 B6x2/4 vs Scania S 410 B6x2*4

Scania G 410 B6x2/4

2019–2022 · 302 kW
33.2l/100 km
median; across 1 declared configurations

Scania S 410 B6x2*4

2019–2021 · 302 kW
32.3l/100 km
median; across 1 declared configurations
Scania G 410 B6x2/4 and Scania S 410 B6x2*4 side by side
SpecificationScania G 410 B6x2/4Scania S 410 B6x2*4
Vehicle formLorry (BA)RegisteredLorry (BA)Registered
Axle configuration6×2Declared6×2Declared
Registered new2019–2022Registeredcentral 90% of records2019–2021Registeredcentral 90% of records
Engine power302 kWDeclared302 kWDeclared
Engine displacement12.7 litresDeclared12.7 litresDeclared
GearboxautomatedDeclaredautomatedDeclared
Gross vehicle weight26,500–28,000 kgDeclaredmedian 27,000 kg, across 20 declared configurations26,500–28,000 kgDeclaredmedian 27,000 kg, across 23 declared configurations
Declared fuel, long haul33.2 l/100 km Declaredmedian; across 1 declared configuration32.3 l/100 km Declaredmedian; across 1 declared configuration
CO₂ per tonne-km45 g Declaredmedian43.83 g Declaredmedian

Fuel and CO₂: long haul at 19.3 t, 2022 declarations.

What the numbers actually say

There is 0.9 l/100 km between these two (2.7%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 1,080 litres a year (£1,512).

Fuel over a year

120,000 km · assumed price
Scania G 410 B6x2/439,840 litres
£55,776 at the assumed price
Scania S 410 B6x2*438,760 litres
£54,264 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.