Comparison · 8×4 lorry · construction at 12.9 t

Scania G 410 B8x4*4 vs Scania G 410 B8x4

Scania G 410 B8x4*4

2020–2023 · 302 kW
41.8l/100 km
median; 39.1–44 across 8 declared configurations

Scania G 410 B8x4

2020–2023 · 302 kW
40.4l/100 km
median; 39.3–44.6 across 9 declared configurations
Scania G 410 B8x4*4 and Scania G 410 B8x4 side by side
SpecificationScania G 410 B8x4*4Scania G 410 B8x4
Vehicle formLorry (BA)RegisteredLorry (BA)Registered
Axle configuration8×4Declared8×4Declared
Registered new2020–2023Registeredcentral 90% of records2020–2023Registeredcentral 90% of records
Engine power302 kWDeclared302 kWDeclared
Engine displacement12.7 litresDeclared12.7 litresDeclared
GearboxautomatedDeclaredautomatedDeclared
Gross vehicle weight33,000–43,000 kgDeclaredmedian 37,000 kg, across 197 declared configurations35,000–52,000 kgDeclaredmedian 39,000 kg, across 24 declared configurations
Declared fuel, construction41.8 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 39.1–44 l/100 km across 8 declared configurations40.4 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 39.3–44.6 l/100 km across 9 declared configurations
CO₂ per tonne-km84.9 g Declaredmedian; 79.37–89.3 g81.99 g Declaredmedian; 79.75–90.5 g

Fuel and CO₂: construction at 12.9 t, 2022 declarations.

What the numbers actually say

There is 1.4 l/100 km between these two (3.4%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 1,680 litres a year (£2,352). The declared figures for one of them alone span 5.3 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.

Fuel over a year

120,000 km · assumed price
Scania G 410 B8x4*450,160 litres
£70,224 at the assumed price
Scania G 410 B8x448,480 litres
£67,872 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.