Comparison · 6×2 tractor unit · long haul at 19.3 t

Scania G 500 A6x2/2 vs Scania G 500 A6x2

Scania G 500 A6x2/2

2019–2023 · 368 kW
28.9l/100 km
median; 28.9–31.6 across 2 declared configurations

Scania G 500 A6x2

2019–2023 · 368 kW
30.6l/100 km
median; 30.2–31 across 3 declared configurations
Scania G 500 A6x2/2 and Scania G 500 A6x2 side by side
SpecificationScania G 500 A6x2/2Scania G 500 A6x2
Vehicle formTractor unit for semi-trailer (BC)RegisteredTractor unit for semi-trailer (BC)Registered
Axle configuration6×2Declared6×2Declared
Registered new2019–2023Registeredcentral 90% of records2019–2023Registeredcentral 90% of records
Engine power368 kWDeclared368 kWDeclared
Engine displacement12.7 litresDeclared12.7 litresDeclared
GearboxautomatedDeclaredautomatedDeclared
Gross vehicle weight24,300–28,000 kgDeclaredmedian 25,300 kg, across 22 declared configurations25,300–30,000 kgDeclaredmedian 26,500 kg, across 46 declared configurations
Declared fuel, long haul28.9 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 28.9–31.6 l/100 km across 2 declared configurations30.6 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 30.2–31 l/100 km across 3 declared configurations
CO₂ per tonne-km39.23 g Declaredmedian; 39.23–42.81 g41.42 g Declaredmedian; 40.89–42.03 g

Fuel and CO₂: long haul at 19.3 t, 2022 declarations.

What the numbers actually say

There is 1.7 l/100 km between these two (5.8%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 2,040 litres a year (£2,856). The declared figures for one of them alone span 2.7 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.

Fuel over a year

120,000 km · assumed price
Scania G 500 A6x2/234,680 litres
£48,552 at the assumed price
Scania G 500 A6x236,720 litres
£51,408 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.