AllTruckData
Comparison · 8×4 lorry · construction at 12.9 t

Scania P 360 B8x4*4 vs Scania P 370 B8x4

Scania P 360 B8x4*4

2020–2022 · 265 kW
41.3l/100 km
median; 41.3–41.4 across 2 declared configurations

Scania P 370 B8x4

2020–2022 · 272 kW
43.8l/100 km
median; across 1 declared configurations
Scania P 360 B8x4*4 and Scania P 370 B8x4 side by side
SpecificationScania P 360 B8x4*4Scania P 370 B8x4
Vehicle formLorry (BA)RegisteredLorry (BA)Registered
Axle configuration8×4Declared8×4Declared
Registered new2020–2022Registeredcentral 90% of records2020–2022Registeredcentral 90% of records
Engine power265 kWDeclared272 kWDeclared
Engine displacement9.3 litresDeclared12.7 litresDeclared
GearboxautomatedDeclaredautomated, manualDeclared
Gross vehicle weight37,000 kgDeclared34,000–44,000 kgDeclaredmedian 36,000 kg, across 13 declared configurations
Declared fuel, construction41.3 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 41.3–41.4 l/100 km across 2 declared configurations43.8 l/100 km Declaredmedian; across 1 declared configuration
CO₂ per tonne-km83.7 g Declaredmedian; 83.7–83.9 g88.94 g Declaredmedian

Fuel and CO₂: construction at 12.9 t, 2022 declarations.

What the numbers actually say

There is 2.5 l/100 km between these two (6%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 3,000 litres a year (£4,200).

P 360 B8x4*4 full specificationP 370 B8x4 full specification

Fuel over a year

120,000 km · assumed price
Scania P 360 B8x4*449,560 litres
£69,384 at the assumed price
Scania P 370 B8x452,560 litres
£73,584 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.