Comparison · 6×2 lorry · long haul at 19.3 t

Scania P 450 A6x2/2 vs Scania R 450 A6x2/4, lorry (2019)

Scania P 450 A6x2/2

2019–2020 · 331 kW
32l/100 km
median; 30.7–35.9 across 63 declared configurations

Scania R 450 A6x2/4, lorry (2019)

2019 · 331 kW
31.1l/100 km
median; 29.4–34.5 across 33 declared configurations
Scania P 450 A6x2/2 and Scania R 450 A6x2/4, lorry (2019) side by side
SpecificationScania P 450 A6x2/2Scania R 450 A6x2/4, lorry (2019)
Vehicle formLorry (BA)RegisteredLorry (BA)Registered
Axle configuration6×2Declared6×2Declared
Registered new2019–2020Registeredcentral 90% of records2019Registeredcentral 90% of records
Engine power331 kWDeclared331 kWDeclared
Engine displacement12.7 litresDeclared12.7 litresDeclared
GearboxautomatedDeclaredautomatedDeclared
Gross vehicle weight24,000–25,300 kgDeclaredmedian 24,300 kg, across 124 declared configurations24,300 kgDeclared
Declared fuel, long haul32 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 30.7–35.9 l/100 km across 63 declared configurations31.1 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 29.4–34.5 l/100 km across 33 declared configurations
CO₂ per tonne-km43.4 g Declaredmedian; 41.6–48.6 g42.2 g Declaredmedian; 39.9–46.8 g

Fuel and CO₂: long haul at 19.3 t, 2019 declarations.

What the numbers actually say

There is 0.9 l/100 km between these two (2.8%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 1,080 litres a year (£1,512). The declared figures for one of them alone span 5.2 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.

Fuel over a year

120,000 km · assumed price
Scania P 450 A6x2/238,400 litres
£53,760 at the assumed price
Scania R 450 A6x2/4, lorry (2019)37,320 litres
£52,248 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.