Comparison · 6×2 tractor unit · long haul at 19.3 t
Scania R 460 A6x2/4 vs Volvo FH, 345 kW, 6x2 tractor unit (from 2020)
Volvo FH, 345 kW, 6x2 tractor unit (from 2020)
2020–2026 · 345 kW
29.3l/100 km
median; 27–35.9 across 321 declared configurations
What the numbers actually say
There is 2.3 l/100 km between these two (8.5%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 2,760 litres a year (£3,864). The declared figures for one of them alone span 8.9 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.
Fuel over a year
120,000 km · assumed priceScania R 460 A6x2/432,400 litres
£45,360 at the assumed price
Volvo FH, 345 kW, 6x2 tractor unit (from 2020)35,160 litres
£49,224 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.