Comparison · 6×2 lorry · long haul at 19.3 t

Scania R 520 A6x2, lorry (2019–2020) vs Scania S 520 B6x2

Scania R 520 A6x2, lorry (2019–2020)

2019–2020 · 382 kW
33.1l/100 km
median; 32.3–35.3 across 10 declared configurations

Scania S 520 B6x2

2019–2021 · 382 kW
35.7l/100 km
median; 34.9–35.9 across 3 declared configurations
Scania R 520 A6x2, lorry (2019–2020) and Scania S 520 B6x2 side by side
SpecificationScania R 520 A6x2, lorry (2019–2020)Scania S 520 B6x2
Vehicle formLorry (BA)RegisteredLorry (BA)Registered
Axle configuration6×2Declared6×2Declared
Registered new2019–2020Registeredcentral 90% of records2019–2021Registeredcentral 90% of records
Engine power382 kWDeclared382 kWDeclared
Engine displacement16.4 litresDeclared16.4 litresDeclared
Gearboxautomated, manualDeclaredautomatedDeclared
Gross vehicle weight27,000–28,000 kgDeclaredmedian 27,000 kg, across 10 declared configurations27,000–30,000 kgDeclaredmedian 28,000 kg, across 35 declared configurations
Declared fuel, long haul33.1 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 32.3–35.3 l/100 km across 10 declared configurations35.7 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 34.9–35.9 l/100 km across 3 declared configurations
CO₂ per tonne-km44.9 g Declaredmedian; 43.8–47.9 g48.4 g Declaredmedian; 47.3–48.7 g

Fuel and CO₂: long haul at 19.3 t, 2019 declarations.

What the numbers actually say

There is 2.6 l/100 km between these two (7.8%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 3,120 litres a year (£4,368). The declared figures for one of them alone span 3 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.

Fuel over a year

120,000 km · assumed price
Scania R 520 A6x2, lorry (2019–2020)39,720 litres
£55,608 at the assumed price
Scania S 520 B6x242,840 litres
£59,976 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.