AllTruckData
Comparison · 6×2 tractor unit · long haul at 19.3 t

Scania R 560 A6x2/2 vs Scania R 560 A6x2/4

Scania R 560 A6x2/2

2023 · 412 kW
26.3l/100 km
median; across 1 declared configurations

Scania R 560 A6x2/4

2022–2023 · 412 kW
27.4l/100 km
median; 26.5–32 across 23 declared configurations
Scania R 560 A6x2/2 and Scania R 560 A6x2/4 side by side
SpecificationScania R 560 A6x2/2Scania R 560 A6x2/4
Vehicle formTractor unit for semi-trailer (BC)RegisteredTractor unit for semi-trailer (BC)Registered
Axle configuration6×2Declared6×2Declared
Registered new2023Registeredcentral 90% of records2022–2023Registeredcentral 90% of records
Engine power412 kWDeclared412 kWDeclared
Engine displacement12.7 litresDeclared12.7 litresDeclared
GearboxautomatedDeclaredautomatedDeclared
Gross vehicle weight24,000–26,500 kgDeclaredmedian 24,300 kg, across 10 declared configurations26,500–28,000 kgDeclaredmedian 27,000 kg, across 30 declared configurations
Declared fuel, long haul26.3 l/100 km Declaredmedian; across 1 declared configuration27.4 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 26.5–32 l/100 km across 23 declared configurations
CO₂ per tonne-km35.6 g Declaredmedian37.11 g Declaredmedian; 35.91–43.33 g

Fuel and CO₂: long haul at 19.3 t, 2022 declarations.

What the numbers actually say

There is 1.1 l/100 km between these two (4.1%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 1,320 litres a year (£1,848). The declared figures for one of them alone span 5.5 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.

R 560 A6x2/2 full specificationR 560 A6x2/4 full specification

Fuel over a year

120,000 km · assumed price
Scania R 560 A6x2/231,560 litres
£44,184 at the assumed price
Scania R 560 A6x2/432,880 litres
£46,032 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.