Comparison · 6×2 lorry · long haul at 19.3 t

Scania R 560 B6x2 vs Volvo FM, 405 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry

Scania R 560 B6x2

2022–2023 · 412 kW
31.8l/100 km
median; 29.7–32.9 across 56 declared configurations

Volvo FM, 405 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry

2019–2023 · 405 kW
34.5l/100 km
median; 31.8–37.9 across 7 declared configurations
Scania R 560 B6x2 and Volvo FM, 405 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry side by side
SpecificationScania R 560 B6x2Volvo FM, 405 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry
Vehicle formLorry (BA)RegisteredLorry (BA)Registered
Axle configuration6×2Declared6×2Declared
Registered new2022–2023Registeredcentral 90% of records2019–2023Registeredcentral 90% of records
Engine power412 kWDeclared405 kWDeclared
Engine displacement12.7 litresDeclared12.8 litresDeclared
GearboxautomatedDeclaredautomatedDeclared
Gross vehicle weight27,000–31,000 kgDeclaredmedian 28,000 kg, across 82 declared configurations27,000–33,000 kgDeclaredmedian 28,000 kg, across 49 declared configurations
Declared fuel, long haul31.8 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 29.7–32.9 l/100 km across 56 declared configurations34.5 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 31.8–37.9 l/100 km across 7 declared configurations
CO₂ per tonne-km43.18 g Declaredmedian; 40.3–44.7 g46.82 g Declaredmedian; 43.13–51.3 g

Fuel and CO₂: long haul at 19.3 t, 2022 declarations.

What the numbers actually say

There is 2.7 l/100 km between these two (8.4%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 3,240 litres a year (£4,536). The declared figures for one of them alone span 6.1 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.

Fuel over a year

120,000 km · assumed price
Scania R 560 B6x238,160 litres
£53,424 at the assumed price
Volvo FM, 405 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry41,400 litres
£57,960 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.