Comparison · 8×4 lorry · construction at 12.9 t

Scania R 590 B8x4 vs Volvo FH, 413 kW, 8x4 rigid lorry

Scania R 590 B8x4

2022–2023 · 434 kW
43.2l/100 km
median; 41.4–46.1 across 12 declared configurations

Volvo FH, 413 kW, 8x4 rigid lorry

2020–2023 · 413 kW
46.4l/100 km
median; 45.5–49.8 across 16 declared configurations
Scania R 590 B8x4 and Volvo FH, 413 kW, 8x4 rigid lorry side by side
SpecificationScania R 590 B8x4Volvo FH, 413 kW, 8x4 rigid lorry
Vehicle formLorry (BA)RegisteredLorry (BA)Registered
Axle configuration8×4Declared8×4Declared
Registered new2022–2023Registeredcentral 90% of records2020–2023Registeredcentral 90% of records
Engine power434 kWDeclared413 kWDeclared
Engine displacement16.4 litresDeclared16.1 litresDeclared
GearboxautomatedDeclaredautomatedDeclared
Gross vehicle weight35,000–60,000 kgDeclaredmedian 41,000 kg, across 74 declared configurations36,000–40,000 kgDeclaredmedian 39,000 kg, across 59 declared configurations
Declared fuel, construction43.2 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 41.4–46.1 l/100 km across 12 declared configurations46.4 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 45.5–49.8 l/100 km across 16 declared configurations
CO₂ per tonne-km87.7 g Declaredmedian; 83.9–93.5 g94.14 g Declaredmedian; 92.28–101 g

Fuel and CO₂: construction at 12.9 t, 2022 declarations.

What the numbers actually say

There is 3.2 l/100 km between these two (7.4%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 3,840 litres a year (£5,376). The declared figures for one of them alone span 4.7 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.

Fuel over a year

120,000 km · assumed price
Scania R 590 B8x451,840 litres
£72,576 at the assumed price
Volvo FH, 413 kW, 8x4 rigid lorry55,680 litres
£77,952 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.