Comparison · 6×2 tractor unit · long haul at 19.3 t
Scania R 660 A6x2/4 vs Volvo FH, 478 kW, 6x2 tractor unit
Scania R 660 A6x2/4
2021–2023 · 485 kW
30.8l/100 km
median; 28.8–34.8 across 24 declared configurations
Volvo FH, 478 kW, 6x2 tractor unit
2019–2023 · 478 kW
33.7l/100 km
median; 32.3–38.7 across 20 declared configurations
What the numbers actually say
There is 2.9 l/100 km between these two (9.4%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 3,480 litres a year (£4,872). The declared figures for one of them alone span 6.4 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.
Fuel over a year
120,000 km · assumed priceScania R 660 A6x2/436,960 litres
£51,744 at the assumed price
Volvo FH, 478 kW, 6x2 tractor unit40,440 litres
£56,616 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.