Comparison · 6×2 lorry · long haul at 19.3 t

Scania R 730 B6x2*4 vs Volvo FH, 552 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry

Scania R 730 B6x2*4

2019–2021 · 537 kW
40.1l/100 km
median; 36.3–40.2 across 5 declared configurations

Volvo FH, 552 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry

2019–2023 · 552 kW
38.2l/100 km
median; 35.7–41.3 across 33 declared configurations
Scania R 730 B6x2*4 and Volvo FH, 552 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry side by side
SpecificationScania R 730 B6x2*4Volvo FH, 552 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry
Vehicle formLorry (BA)RegisteredLorry (BA)Registered
Axle configuration6×2Declared6×2Declared
Registered new2019–2021Registeredcentral 90% of records2019–2023Registeredcentral 90% of records
Engine power537 kWDeclared552 kWDeclared
Engine displacement16.4 litresDeclared16.1 litresDeclared
GearboxautomatedDeclaredautomatedDeclared
Gross vehicle weight27,000–30,000 kgDeclaredmedian 29,000 kg, across 14 declared configurations27,000–33,000 kgDeclaredmedian 28,000 kg, across 152 declared configurations
Declared fuel, long haul40.1 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 36.3–40.2 l/100 km across 5 declared configurations38.2 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 35.7–41.3 l/100 km across 33 declared configurations
CO₂ per tonne-km54.4 g Declaredmedian; 49.3–54.5 g51.76 g Declaredmedian; 48.35–56.1 g

Fuel and CO₂: long haul at 19.3 t, 2020 declarations.

What the numbers actually say

There is 1.9 l/100 km between these two (4.9%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 2,280 litres a year (£3,192). The declared figures for one of them alone span 5.6 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.

Fuel over a year

120,000 km · assumed price
Scania R 730 B6x2*448,120 litres
£67,368 at the assumed price
Volvo FH, 552 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry45,840 litres
£64,176 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.