Comparison · 6×2 lorry · long haul at 19.3 t

Scania R 770 B6x2 vs Volvo FH, 552 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry

Scania R 770 B6x2

2021–2023 · 566 kW
37.1l/100 km
median; 36.3–38 across 12 declared configurations

Volvo FH, 552 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry

2019–2023 · 552 kW
38.2l/100 km
median; 35.7–41.3 across 33 declared configurations
Scania R 770 B6x2 and Volvo FH, 552 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry side by side
SpecificationScania R 770 B6x2Volvo FH, 552 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry
Vehicle formLorry (BA)RegisteredLorry (BA)Registered
Axle configuration6×2Declared6×2Declared
Registered new2021–2023Registeredcentral 90% of records2019–2023Registeredcentral 90% of records
Engine power566 kWDeclared552 kWDeclared
Engine displacement16.4 litresDeclared16.1 litresDeclared
GearboxautomatedDeclaredautomatedDeclared
Gross vehicle weight27,500–30,000 kgDeclaredmedian 28,000 kg, across 32 declared configurations27,000–33,000 kgDeclaredmedian 28,000 kg, across 152 declared configurations
Declared fuel, long haul37.1 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 36.3–38 l/100 km across 12 declared configurations38.2 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 35.7–41.3 l/100 km across 33 declared configurations
CO₂ per tonne-km50.24 g Declaredmedian; 49.17–51.5 g51.76 g Declaredmedian; 48.35–56.1 g

Fuel and CO₂: long haul at 19.3 t, 2022 declarations.

What the numbers actually say

There is 1.1 l/100 km between these two (2.9%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 1,320 litres a year (£1,848). The declared figures for one of them alone span 5.6 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.

Fuel over a year

120,000 km · assumed price
Scania R 770 B6x244,520 litres
£62,328 at the assumed price
Volvo FH, 552 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry45,840 litres
£64,176 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.