Comparison · 8×4 lorry · construction at 12.9 t

Scania S 650 B8x4*4 vs Volvo FH, 478 kW, 8x4 rigid lorry (2020–2023)

Scania S 650 B8x4*4

2020–2021 · 478 kW
45.6l/100 km
median; 45.3–48.1 across 3 declared configurations

Volvo FH, 478 kW, 8x4 rigid lorry (2020–2023)

2020–2023 · 478 kW
46.1l/100 km
median; 42.8–49 across 44 declared configurations
Scania S 650 B8x4*4 and Volvo FH, 478 kW, 8x4 rigid lorry (2020–2023) side by side
SpecificationScania S 650 B8x4*4Volvo FH, 478 kW, 8x4 rigid lorry (2020–2023)
Vehicle formLorry (BA)RegisteredLorry (BA)Registered
Axle configuration8×4Declared8×4Declared
Registered new2020–2021Registeredcentral 90% of records2020–2023Registeredcentral 90% of records
Engine power478 kWDeclared478 kWDeclared
Engine displacement16.4 litresDeclared16.1 litresDeclared
GearboxautomatedDeclaredautomatedDeclared
Gross vehicle weight33,000–42,000 kgDeclaredmedian 33,000 kg, across 26 declared configurations35,000–40,000 kgDeclaredmedian 40,000 kg, across 166 declared configurations
Declared fuel, construction45.6 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 45.3–48.1 l/100 km across 3 declared configurations46.1 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 42.8–49 l/100 km across 44 declared configurations
CO₂ per tonne-km92.6 g Declaredmedian; 91.9–97.6 g93.57 g Declaredmedian; 86.85–99.3 g

Fuel and CO₂: construction at 12.9 t, 2021 declarations.

What the numbers actually say

There is 0.5 l/100 km between these two (1%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 600 litres a year (£840). The declared figures for one of them alone span 6.2 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.

Fuel over a year

120,000 km · assumed price
Scania S 650 B8x4*454,720 litres
£76,608 at the assumed price
Volvo FH, 478 kW, 8x4 rigid lorry (2020–2023)55,320 litres
£77,448 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.