Comparison · 6×2 tractor unit · long haul at 19.3 t
Scania S 660 A6x2, tractor unit (2021–2023) vs Volvo FH, 478 kW, 6x2 tractor unit
Scania S 660 A6x2, tractor unit (2021–2023)
2021–2023 · 485 kW
31.4l/100 km
median; 28.8–32.6 across 97 declared configurations
Volvo FH, 478 kW, 6x2 tractor unit
2019–2023 · 478 kW
33.7l/100 km
median; 32.3–38.7 across 20 declared configurations
What the numbers actually say
There is 2.3 l/100 km between these two (7.3%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 2,760 litres a year (£3,864). The declared figures for one of them alone span 6.4 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.
Fuel over a year
120,000 km · assumed priceScania S 660 A6x2, tractor unit (2021–2023)37,680 litres
£52,752 at the assumed price
Volvo FH, 478 kW, 6x2 tractor unit40,440 litres
£56,616 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.