AllTruckData
Comparison · 6×2 tractor unit · long haul at 19.3 t

Scania S 730 A6x2/4 vs Scania S 770 A6x2/4

Scania S 730 A6x2/4

2019–2021 · 537 kW
34.7l/100 km
median; across 1 declared configurations

Scania S 770 A6x2/4

2021–2023 · 566 kW
32.3l/100 km
median; 30.1–33.6 across 31 declared configurations
Scania S 730 A6x2/4 and Scania S 770 A6x2/4 side by side
SpecificationScania S 730 A6x2/4Scania S 770 A6x2/4
Vehicle formTractor unit for semi-trailer (BC)RegisteredTractor unit for semi-trailer (BC)Registered
Axle configuration6×2Declared6×2Declared
Registered new2019–2021Registeredcentral 90% of records2021–2023Registeredcentral 90% of records
Engine power537 kWDeclared566 kWDeclared
Engine displacement16.4 litresDeclared16.4 litresDeclared
GearboxautomatedDeclaredautomatedDeclared
Gross vehicle weight24,300–28,000 kgDeclaredmedian 27,000 kg, across 16 declared configurations24,300–28,000 kgDeclaredmedian 27,000 kg, across 87 declared configurations
Declared fuel, long haul34.7 l/100 km Declaredmedian; across 1 declared configuration32.3 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 30.1–33.6 l/100 km across 31 declared configurations
CO₂ per tonne-km47 g Declaredmedian43.73 g Declaredmedian; 40.79–45.6 g

Fuel and CO₂: long haul at 19.3 t, 2020 declarations.

What the numbers actually say

There is 2.4 l/100 km between these two (7.4%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 2,880 litres a year (£4,032). The declared figures for one of them alone span 3.5 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.

S 730 A6x2/4 full specificationS 770 A6x2/4 full specification

Fuel over a year

120,000 km · assumed price
Scania S 730 A6x2/441,640 litres
£58,296 at the assumed price
Scania S 770 A6x2/438,760 litres
£54,264 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.