Comparison · 6×2 tractor unit · long haul at 19.3 t
Scania S 730 A6x2, tractor unit (2016–2022) vs Volvo FH, 552 kW, 6x2 tractor unit (2019–2023)
Scania S 730 A6x2, tractor unit (2016–2022)
2016–2022 · 537 kW
34l/100 km
median; 34–34.5 across 2 declared configurations
Volvo FH, 552 kW, 6x2 tractor unit (2019–2023)
2019–2023 · 552 kW
34.1l/100 km
median; 32.8–36.7 across 27 declared configurations
What the numbers actually say
There is 0.1 l/100 km between these two (0.2%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 120 litres a year (£168). The declared figures for one of them alone span 3.9 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.
Fuel over a year
120,000 km · assumed priceScania S 730 A6x2, tractor unit (2016–2022)40,800 litres
£57,120 at the assumed price
Volvo FH, 552 kW, 6x2 tractor unit (2019–2023)40,920 litres
£57,288 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.