Comparison · 6×2 tractor unit · long haul at 19.3 t
Scania S 770 A6x2/4 vs Volvo FH, 552 kW, 6x2 tractor unit (2019–2023)
Scania S 770 A6x2/4
2021–2023 · 566 kW
32.3l/100 km
median; 30.1–33.6 across 31 declared configurations
Volvo FH, 552 kW, 6x2 tractor unit (2019–2023)
2019–2023 · 552 kW
34.1l/100 km
median; 32.8–36.7 across 27 declared configurations
What the numbers actually say
There is 1.8 l/100 km between these two (5.5%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 2,160 litres a year (£3,024). The declared figures for one of them alone span 3.9 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.
Fuel over a year
120,000 km · assumed priceScania S 770 A6x2/438,760 litres
£54,264 at the assumed price
Volvo FH, 552 kW, 6x2 tractor unit (2019–2023)40,920 litres
£57,288 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.