Comparison · 4×2 lorry · long haul at 14 t
Volvo FH, 345 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry vs Volvo FM, 345 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry, 12.8 L (2019–2023)
Volvo FH, 345 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry
2019–2023 · 345 kW
29.8l/100 km
median; 27.4–38.4 across 47 declared configurations
Volvo FM, 345 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry, 12.8 L (2019–2023)
2019–2023 · 345 kW
32.2l/100 km
median; 28.9–44.4 across 19 declared configurations
What the numbers actually say
There is 2.4 l/100 km between these two (8%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 2,880 litres a year (£4,032). The declared figures for one of them alone span 15.5 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.
Fuel over a year
120,000 km · assumed priceVolvo FH, 345 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry35,760 litres
£50,064 at the assumed price
Volvo FM, 345 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry, 12.8 L (2019–2023)38,640 litres
£54,096 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.