Comparison · 6×4 lorry · long haul at 19.3 t
Volvo FH, 345 kW, 6x4 rigid lorry vs Volvo FM, 345 kW, 6x4 rigid lorry, 12.8 L (2020–2023)
Volvo FH, 345 kW, 6x4 rigid lorry
2020–2023 · 345 kW
38.3l/100 km
median; 33–43.3 across 36 declared configurations
Volvo FM, 345 kW, 6x4 rigid lorry, 12.8 L (2020–2023)
2020–2023 · 345 kW
38.4l/100 km
median; 34.2–40.6 across 14 declared configurations
What the numbers actually say
There is 0.1 l/100 km between these two (0.2%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 120 litres a year (£168). The declared figures for one of them alone span 10.3 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.
Fuel over a year
120,000 km · assumed priceVolvo FH, 345 kW, 6x4 rigid lorry45,960 litres
£64,344 at the assumed price
Volvo FM, 345 kW, 6x4 rigid lorry, 12.8 L (2020–2023)46,080 litres
£64,512 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.