Comparison · 6×4 tractor unit · long haul at 19.3 t
Volvo FH, 345 kW, 6x4 tractor unit vs Volvo FM, 345 kW, 6x4 tractor unit, 12.8 L (2020–2023)
Volvo FH, 345 kW, 6x4 tractor unit
2013–2023 · 345 kW
36l/100 km
median; 32.7–40.6 across 5 declared configurations
Volvo FM, 345 kW, 6x4 tractor unit, 12.8 L (2020–2023)
2020–2023 · 345 kW
36.5l/100 km
median; 36.1–37.5 across 4 declared configurations
What the numbers actually say
There is 0.5 l/100 km between these two (1.3%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 600 litres a year (£840). The declared figures for one of them alone span 7.9 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.
Fuel over a year
120,000 km · assumed priceVolvo FH, 345 kW, 6x4 tractor unit43,200 litres
£60,480 at the assumed price
Volvo FM, 345 kW, 6x4 tractor unit, 12.8 L (2020–2023)43,800 litres
£61,320 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.