Comparison · 6×4 lorry · long haul at 19.3 t
Volvo FM, 285 kW, 6x4 rigid lorry vs Volvo FMX, 285 kW, 6x4 rigid lorry
Volvo FM, 285 kW, 6x4 rigid lorry
2020–2024 · 285 kW
38.5l/100 km
median; 36.6–47.2 across 3 declared configurations
Volvo FMX, 285 kW, 6x4 rigid lorry
2021–2023 · 285 kW
35.9l/100 km
median; 35.4–41.4 across 14 declared configurations
What the numbers actually say
There is 2.6 l/100 km between these two (7.2%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 3,120 litres a year (£4,368). The declared figures for one of them alone span 10.6 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.
Fuel over a year
120,000 km · assumed priceVolvo FM, 285 kW, 6x4 rigid lorry46,200 litres
£64,680 at the assumed price
Volvo FMX, 285 kW, 6x4 rigid lorry43,080 litres
£60,312 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.