Comparison · 6×2 lorry · long haul at 19.3 t
DAF CF 340 FAG vs Volvo FM, 250 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry
DAF CF 340 FAG
2018–2022 · 250–251 kW (median 250)
39.2l/100 km
median; 35.8–40.4 across 12 declared configurations
Volvo FM, 250 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry
2014–2019 · 250 kW
37.9l/100 km
median; 35.2–40.5 across 54 declared configurations
What the numbers actually say
There is 1.3 l/100 km between these two (3.4%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 1,560 litres a year (£2,184). The declared figures for one of them alone span 5.3 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.
Fuel over a year
120,000 km · assumed priceDAF CF 340 FAG47,040 litres
£65,856 at the assumed price
Volvo FM, 250 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry45,480 litres
£63,672 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.