Comparison · 4×2 lorry · long haul at 14 t

DAF CF 530 FA vs Scania G 540 B4x2

DAF CF 530 FA

2019–2022 · 390 kW
31.3l/100 km
median; across 1 declared configurations

Scania G 540 B4x2

2020–2022 · 397 kW
31l/100 km
median; across 1 declared configurations
DAF CF 530 FA and Scania G 540 B4x2 side by side
SpecificationDAF CF 530 FAScania G 540 B4x2
Vehicle formLorry (BA)RegisteredLorry (BA)Registered
Axle configuration4×2Declared4×2Declared
Registered new2019–2022Registeredcentral 90% of records2020–2022Registeredcentral 90% of records
Engine power390 kWDeclared397 kWDeclared
Engine displacement12.9 litresDeclared12.7 litresDeclared
Gearboxautomated, manualDeclaredautomatedDeclared
Emission classEURO VI CRegisteredNot recorded
Gross vehicle weight19,000 kgRegistered19,500–22,000 kgDeclaredmedian 20,500 kg, across 20 declared configurations
Kerb weight9,736 kgRegisteredNot recorded
Wheelbase5,400 mmRegisteredNot recorded
Overall length8,880 mmRegisteredNot recorded
Declared fuel, long haul31.3 l/100 km Declaredmedian; across 1 declared configuration31 l/100 km Declaredmedian; across 1 declared configuration
CO₂ per tonne-km58.42 g Declaredmedian57.9 g Declaredmedian

Fuel and CO₂: long haul at 14 t, 2022 declarations.

What the numbers actually say

There is 0.3 l/100 km between these two (0.9%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 360 litres a year (£504).

Fuel over a year

120,000 km · assumed price
DAF CF 530 FA37,560 litres
£52,584 at the assumed price
Scania G 540 B4x237,200 litres
£52,080 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.