AllTruckData
Comparison · 6×4 lorry · long haul at 19.3 t

DAF CF 530 FAT vs Scania G 540 B6x4

DAF CF 530 FAT

2020–2022 · 390 kW
37l/100 km
median; 37–40.7 across 2 declared configurations

Scania G 540 B6x4

2020–2022 · 397 kW
37.7l/100 km
median; 33.4–41.2 across 6 declared configurations
DAF CF 530 FAT and Scania G 540 B6x4 side by side
SpecificationDAF CF 530 FATScania G 540 B6x4
Vehicle formLorry (BA)RegisteredLorry (BA)Registered
Axle configuration6×4Declared6×4Declared
Registered new2020–2022Registeredcentral 90% of records2020–2022Registeredcentral 90% of records
Engine power390 kWDeclared397 kWDeclared
Engine displacement12.9 litresDeclared12.7 litresDeclared
Gearboxautomated, manualDeclaredautomatedDeclared
Gross vehicle weight26,500–34,000 kgDeclaredmedian 33,000 kg, across 28 declared configurations26,100–49,000 kgDeclaredmedian 30,000 kg, across 30 declared configurations
Declared fuel, long haul37 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 37–40.7 l/100 km across 2 declared configurations37.7 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 33.4–41.2 l/100 km across 6 declared configurations
CO₂ per tonne-km50.16 g Declaredmedian; 50.16–55.2 g51.05 g Declaredmedian; 45.27–55.85 g

Fuel and CO₂: long haul at 19.3 t, 2022 declarations.

What the numbers actually say

There is 0.7 l/100 km between these two (1.8%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 840 litres a year (£1,176). The declared figures for one of them alone span 7.8 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.

CF 530 FAT full specificationG 540 B6x4 full specification

Fuel over a year

120,000 km · assumed price
DAF CF 530 FAT44,400 litres
£62,160 at the assumed price
Scania G 540 B6x445,240 litres
£63,336 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.