Comparison · 6×2 lorry · long haul at 19.3 t

MAN TGS 26.420 6x2-2 vs Volvo FM, 338 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry

MAN TGS 26.420 6x2-2

2019 · 309 kW
36.6l/100 km
median; 34.7–39.3 across 40 declared configurations

Volvo FM, 338 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry

2019 · 338 kW
38.2l/100 km
median; 36.4–41.2 across 36 declared configurations
MAN TGS 26.420 6x2-2 and Volvo FM, 338 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry side by side
SpecificationMAN TGS 26.420 6x2-2Volvo FM, 338 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry
Vehicle formLorry (BA)RegisteredLorry (BA)Registered
Axle configuration6×2Declared6×2Declared
Registered new2019Registeredcentral 90% of records2019Registeredcentral 90% of records
Engine power309 kWDeclared338 kWDeclared
Engine displacement12.4 litresDeclared10.8 litresDeclared
Gearboxautomated, manualDeclaredautomatedDeclared
Gross vehicle weight26,000–28,000 kgDeclaredmedian 26,000 kg, across 49 declared configurations24,000–32,000 kgDeclaredmedian 28,000 kg, across 38 declared configurations
Declared fuel, long haul36.6 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 34.7–39.3 l/100 km across 40 declared configurations38.2 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 36.4–41.2 l/100 km across 36 declared configurations
CO₂ per tonne-km49.7 g Declaredmedian; 47.1–53.2 g51.8 g Declaredmedian; 49.4–55.9 g

Fuel and CO₂: long haul at 19.3 t, 2019 declarations.

What the numbers actually say

There is 1.6 l/100 km between these two (4.3%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 1,920 litres a year (£2,688). The declared figures for one of them alone span 4.8 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.

Fuel over a year

120,000 km · assumed price
MAN TGS 26.420 6x2-243,920 litres
£61,488 at the assumed price
Volvo FM, 338 kW, 6x2 rigid lorry45,840 litres
£64,176 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.