AllTruckData
Comparison · 6×2 lorry · long haul at 19.3 t

MAN TGS 28.320 6x2-4 vs Scania R 320 B6x2*4

MAN TGS 28.320 6x2-4

2019–2020 · 235 kW
36.3l/100 km
median; 36.3–36.7 across 2 declared configurations

Scania R 320 B6x2*4

2019–2023 · 235 kW
33.4l/100 km
median; 33.3–35.9 across 4 declared configurations
MAN TGS 28.320 6x2-4 and Scania R 320 B6x2*4 side by side
SpecificationMAN TGS 28.320 6x2-4Scania R 320 B6x2*4
Vehicle formLorry (BA)RegisteredLorry (BA)Registered
Axle configuration6×2Declared6×2Declared
Registered new2019–2020Registeredcentral 90% of records2019–2023Registeredcentral 90% of records
Engine power235 kWDeclared235 kWDeclared
Engine displacement10.5 litresDeclared9.3 litresDeclared
GearboxautomatedDeclaredautomated, automaticDeclared
Emission classEEVRegisteredNot recorded
Gross vehicle weight28,000 kgRegistered24,300–28,000 kgDeclaredmedian 27,000 kg, across 24 declared configurations
Kerb weight10,750–14,390 kgRegisteredmedian 10,750 kg, over 3 registrationsNot recorded
Wheelbase5,250 mmRegisteredNot recorded
Overall length8,300–8,880 mmRegisteredmedian 8,880 mm, over 3 registrationsNot recorded
Declared fuel, long haul36.3 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 36.3–36.7 l/100 km across 2 declared configurations33.4 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 33.3–35.9 l/100 km across 4 declared configurations
CO₂ per tonne-km49.2 g Declaredmedian; 49.2–49.7 g45.27 g Declaredmedian; 45.1–48.7 g

Fuel and CO₂: long haul at 19.3 t, 2021 declarations.

What the numbers actually say

There is 2.9 l/100 km between these two (8.6%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 3,480 litres a year (£4,872).

TGS 28.320 6x2-4 full specificationR 320 B6x2*4 full specification

Fuel over a year

120,000 km · assumed price
MAN TGS 28.320 6x2-443,560 litres
£60,984 at the assumed price
Scania R 320 B6x2*440,080 litres
£56,112 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.