Comparison · 6×4 lorry · long haul at 19.3 t
Mercedes-Benz Arocs, 240 kW, 6x4 rigid lorry vs Volvo FM, 251 kW, 6x4 rigid lorry
Mercedes-Benz Arocs, 240 kW, 6x4 rigid lorry
2017–2022 · 240 kW
39.6l/100 km
median; 39.6–40 across 2 declared configurations
Volvo FM, 251 kW, 6x4 rigid lorry
2021–2022 · 251 kW
39.4l/100 km
median; 37.6–42.2 across 4 declared configurations
What the numbers actually say
There is 0.2 l/100 km between these two (0.5%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 240 litres a year (£336). The declared figures for one of them alone span 4.6 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.
Fuel over a year
120,000 km · assumed priceMercedes-Benz Arocs, 240 kW, 6x4 rigid lorry47,520 litres
£66,528 at the assumed price
Volvo FM, 251 kW, 6x4 rigid lorry47,280 litres
£66,192 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.