Comparison · 6×2 tractor unit · long haul at 19.3 t

Scania G 410 A6x2 vs Scania R 410 B6x2*4, tractor unit (2020)

Scania G 410 A6x2

2019–2023 · 302 kW
33.1l/100 km
median; across 1 declared configurations

Scania R 410 B6x2*4, tractor unit (2020)

2020 · 302 kW
34.3l/100 km
median; 34.3–34.6 across 2 declared configurations
Scania G 410 A6x2 and Scania R 410 B6x2*4, tractor unit (2020) side by side
SpecificationScania G 410 A6x2Scania R 410 B6x2*4, tractor unit (2020)
Vehicle formTractor unit for semi-trailer (BC)RegisteredTractor unit for semi-trailer (BC)Registered
Axle configuration6×2Declared6×2Declared
Registered new2019–2023Registeredcentral 90% of records2020Registeredcentral 90% of records
Engine power302 kWDeclared302 kWDeclared
Engine displacement12.7 litresDeclared12.7 litresDeclared
GearboxautomatedDeclaredautomatedDeclared
Gross vehicle weight26,100–30,000 kgDeclaredmedian 27,000 kg, across 33 declared configurations26,100 kgDeclared
Declared fuel, long haul33.1 l/100 km Declaredmedian; across 1 declared configuration34.3 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 34.3–34.6 l/100 km across 2 declared configurations
CO₂ per tonne-km44.89 g Declaredmedian46.4 g Declaredmedian; 46.4–46.9 g

Fuel and CO₂: long haul at 19.3 t, 2022 declarations.

What the numbers actually say

There is 1.2 l/100 km between these two (3.6%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 1,440 litres a year (£2,016).

Fuel over a year

120,000 km · assumed price
Scania G 410 A6x239,720 litres
£55,608 at the assumed price
Scania R 410 B6x2*4, tractor unit (2020)41,160 litres
£57,624 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.