Comparison · 4×2 lorry · long haul at 14 t

Scania P 500 B4x2 vs Volvo FM, 375 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry

Scania P 500 B4x2

2019–2022 · 368 kW
33.2l/100 km
median; 30–37.2 across 9 declared configurations

Volvo FM, 375 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry

2019–2023 · 375 kW
30.8l/100 km
median; 28.8–33.9 across 11 declared configurations
Scania P 500 B4x2 and Volvo FM, 375 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry side by side
SpecificationScania P 500 B4x2Volvo FM, 375 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry
Vehicle formLorry (BA)RegisteredLorry (BA)Registered
Axle configuration4×2Declared4×2Declared
Registered new2019–2022Registeredcentral 90% of records2019–2023Registeredcentral 90% of records
Engine power368 kWDeclared375 kWDeclared
Engine displacement12.7 litresDeclared12.8 litresDeclared
Gearboxautomated, automaticDeclaredautomatedDeclared
Gross vehicle weight18,600–22,000 kgDeclaredmedian 20,500 kg, across 105 declared configurations19,500–23,000 kgDeclaredmedian 21,000 kg, across 56 declared configurations
Declared fuel, long haul33.2 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 30–37.2 l/100 km across 9 declared configurations30.8 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 28.8–33.9 l/100 km across 11 declared configurations
CO₂ per tonne-km62.1 g Declaredmedian; 56.04–69.5 g57.62 g Declaredmedian; 53.85–63.4 g

Fuel and CO₂: long haul at 14 t, 2022 declarations.

What the numbers actually say

There is 2.4 l/100 km between these two (7.7%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 2,880 litres a year (£4,032). The declared figures for one of them alone span 7.2 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.

Fuel over a year

120,000 km · assumed price
Scania P 500 B4x239,840 litres
£55,776 at the assumed price
Volvo FM, 375 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry36,960 litres
£51,744 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.