Comparison · 4×2 lorry · long haul at 14 t

Scania R 320 B4x2 vs Volvo FE, 235 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry

Scania R 320 B4x2

2019–2023 · 235 kW
29.3l/100 km
median; 27.9–32.5 across 15 declared configurations

Volvo FE, 235 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry

2022–2023 · 235 kW
l/100 km
Scania R 320 B4x2 and Volvo FE, 235 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry side by side
SpecificationScania R 320 B4x2Volvo FE, 235 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry
Vehicle formLorry (BA)RegisteredLorry (BA)Registered
Axle configuration4×2Declared4×2Declared
Registered new2019–2023Registeredcentral 90% of records2022–2023Registeredcentral 90% of records
Engine power235 kWDeclared235 kWDeclared
Engine displacement9.3 litresDeclared8.9 litresDeclared
GearboxautomatedDeclaredautomaticDeclared
Emission classEURO VI DRegisteredNot recorded
Gross vehicle weight18,600–19,500 kgRegisteredmedian 18,600 kg, over 2 registrations18,000–21,000 kgDeclaredmedian 20,500 kg, across 54 declared configurations
Kerb weight9,419–11,447 kgRegisteredmedian 9,419 kg, over 2 registrationsNot recorded
Wheelbase4,950–5,550 mmRegisteredmedian 4,950 mm, over 2 registrationsNot recorded
Overall length8,900–10,200 mmRegisteredmedian 8,900 mm, over 2 registrationsNot recorded
Overall height4,000 mmRegisteredNot recorded
Declared fuel, long haul29.3 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 27.9–32.5 l/100 km across 15 declared configurationsNot declared
CO₂ per tonne-km54.7 g Declaredmedian; 52.06–60.8 gNot declared

Fuel and CO₂: long haul at 14 t, 2022 declarations.

What the numbers actually say

We publish the table but give no verdict: they have no fuel figure declared on the same mission, payload and reporting period.