Comparison · 6×2 tractor unit · long haul at 19.3 t
Volvo FH, 345 kW, 6x2 tractor unit (from 2020) vs Volvo FM, 345 kW, 6x2 tractor unit, 12.8 L (2016–2023)
Volvo FH, 345 kW, 6x2 tractor unit (from 2020)
2020–2026 · 345 kW
29.3l/100 km
median; 27–35.9 across 321 declared configurations
Volvo FM, 345 kW, 6x2 tractor unit, 12.8 L (2016–2023)
2016–2023 · 345 kW
31.5l/100 km
median; 29–38.8 across 12 declared configurations
What the numbers actually say
There is 2.2 l/100 km between these two (7.5%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 2,640 litres a year (£3,696). The declared figures for one of them alone span 9.8 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.
Fuel over a year
120,000 km · assumed priceVolvo FH, 345 kW, 6x2 tractor unit (from 2020)35,160 litres
£49,224 at the assumed price
Volvo FM, 345 kW, 6x2 tractor unit, 12.8 L (2016–2023)37,800 litres
£52,920 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.