Comparison · 4×2 lorry · long haul at 14 t
Volvo FM, 250 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry vs Volvo FM, 278 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry
Volvo FM, 250 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry
2019 · 250 kW
34.3l/100 km
median; 31.4–40 across 57 declared configurations
Volvo FM, 278 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry
2019 · 278 kW
34.2l/100 km
median; 32–37.8 across 24 declared configurations
What the numbers actually say
There is 0.1 l/100 km between these two (0.2%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 120 litres a year (£168). The declared figures for one of them alone span 8.6 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.
Fuel over a year
120,000 km · assumed priceVolvo FM, 250 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry41,160 litres
£57,624 at the assumed price
Volvo FM, 278 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry41,040 litres
£57,456 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.