Comparison · 4×2 tractor unit · long haul at 19.3 t
Volvo FM, 308 kW, 4x2 tractor unit (2016–2019) vs Volvo FM, 338 kW, 4x2 tractor unit
Volvo FM, 308 kW, 4x2 tractor unit (2016–2019)
2016–2019 · 308 kW
36.5l/100 km
median; 32.5–39.8 across 20 declared configurations
Volvo FM, 338 kW, 4x2 tractor unit
2014–2019 · 338 kW
37.3l/100 km
median; 32.8–39.5 across 28 declared configurations
What the numbers actually say
There is 0.8 l/100 km between these two (2.1%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 960 litres a year (£1,344). The declared figures for one of them alone span 7.3 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.
Fuel over a year
120,000 km · assumed priceVolvo FM, 308 kW, 4x2 tractor unit (2016–2019)43,800 litres
£61,320 at the assumed price
Volvo FM, 338 kW, 4x2 tractor unit44,760 litres
£62,664 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.