Comparison · 4×2 lorry · long haul at 14 t
Volvo FM, 345 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry, 10.8 L (2019–2023) vs Volvo FM, 345 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry, 12.8 L (2019–2023)
Volvo FM, 345 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry, 10.8 L (2019–2023)
2019–2023 · 345 kW
33.2l/100 km
median; 28.7–42.2 across 14 declared configurations
Volvo FM, 345 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry, 12.8 L (2019–2023)
2019–2023 · 345 kW
32.2l/100 km
median; 28.9–44.4 across 19 declared configurations
What the numbers actually say
There is 1 l/100 km between these two (3.1%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 1,200 litres a year (£1,680). The declared figures for one of them alone span 15.5 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.
Fuel over a year
120,000 km · assumed priceVolvo FM, 345 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry, 10.8 L (2019–2023)39,840 litres
£55,776 at the assumed price
Volvo FM, 345 kW, 4x2 rigid lorry, 12.8 L (2019–2023)38,640 litres
£54,096 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.