Comparison · 6×2 lorry · long haul at 19.3 t
MAN TGS 26.320 6x2/4 vs MAN TGS 28.320 6x2-4
MAN TGS 26.320 6x2/4
2009–2019 · 235 kW
37.3l/100 km
median; 36.2–39.1 across 13 declared configurations
MAN TGS 28.320 6x2-4
2019–2020 · 235 kW
36.3l/100 km
median; 36.3–36.7 across 2 declared configurations
What the numbers actually say
There is 1 l/100 km between these two (2.7%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice: at 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre the gap would be about 1,200 litres a year (£1,680). The declared figures for one of them alone span 2.9 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.
Fuel over a year
120,000 km · assumed priceMAN TGS 26.320 6x2/444,760 litres
£62,664 at the assumed price
MAN TGS 28.320 6x2-443,560 litres
£60,984 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.