Comparison · 6×2 lorry · long haul at 19.3 t

MAN TGX 24.510 6x2/2, lorry (2019–2020) vs Scania S 520 A6x2/2, lorry (2019–2020)

MAN TGX 24.510 6x2/2, lorry (2019–2020)

2019–2020 · 375 kW
32.3l/100 km
median; 32–33.1 across 9 declared configurations

Scania S 520 A6x2/2, lorry (2019–2020)

2019–2020 · 382 kW
32.3l/100 km
median; 32–33.4 across 18 declared configurations
MAN TGX 24.510 6x2/2, lorry (2019–2020) and Scania S 520 A6x2/2, lorry (2019–2020) side by side
SpecificationMAN TGX 24.510 6x2/2, lorry (2019–2020)Scania S 520 A6x2/2, lorry (2019–2020)
Vehicle formLorry (BA)RegisteredLorry (BA)Registered
Axle configuration6×2Declared6×2Declared
Registered new2019–2020Registeredcentral 90% of records2019–2020Registeredcentral 90% of records
Engine power375 kWDeclared382 kWDeclared
Engine displacement12.4 litresDeclared16.4 litresDeclared
GearboxautomatedDeclaredautomatedDeclared
Gross vehicle weight23,000 kgDeclared24,300–26,500 kgDeclaredmedian 24,300 kg, across 18 declared configurations
Declared fuel, long haul32.3 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 32–33.1 l/100 km across 9 declared configurations32.3 l/100 km Declaredmedian; 32–33.4 l/100 km across 18 declared configurations
CO₂ per tonne-km43.8 g Declaredmedian; 43.5–44.9 g43.8 g Declaredmedian; 43.4–45.3 g

Fuel and CO₂: long haul at 19.3 t, 2019 declarations.

What the numbers actually say

There is 0 l/100 km between these two (0%). That is inside the 10% tolerance of declared figures, so on fuel alone neither is the better choice. The declared figures for one of them alone span 1.4 l/100 km across its configurations, so the specification ordered matters more than the choice between these two.

Fuel over a year

120,000 km · assumed price
MAN TGX 24.510 6x2/2, lorry (2019–2020)38,760 litres
£54,264 at the assumed price
Scania S 520 A6x2/2, lorry (2019–2020)38,760 litres
£54,264 at the assumed price
At 120,000 km a year and an assumed £1.40 a litre; the price is an assumption, not one we track.